2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.qref.2016.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of systematic risk in the cross-section of credit default swap spreads

Abstract: This paper analyses the pricing of systematic risk factors in credit default swap contracts in a two-stage empirical framework. In the first pass, we estimate contractspecific sensitivities to several systematic risk factors by time-series regressions using quoted credit default swap (CDS) spreads of 339 U.S. entities from 2004 to 2010. We find that the credit market climate, the cross-market correlation and the market volatility explain CDS spread changes. In the second pass, we examine by crosssection regres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The measure of economic sensitivity to systematic risk w has been the subject of several studies: Dietsch and Petey ( 2004) developed an approach based on the correlation between a borrower's assets; Bystrôm et al (2005) followed a deductive approach, calculating the default distance using the Merton model and then deducting the sensitivities of the systematic factors in relation to default distance; Düllmann and Scheule (2003) and Dietsch and Petey (2008) used the default transition probabilities matrices of borrowers; Düllmann et al (2007), La Porta et al (2002), calculated the correlation between the returns of listed and unlisted shares of borrowers; and Clauβen et al (2017) adopted the approach of Musto and Souleles (2006) by estimating the sensitivity to systematic risk by the CAPM-Beta model. They concluded that the borrower's systematic risk has been priced better beyond idiosyncratic factors and that it increases in crisis periods.…”
Section: Systematic Risk Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure of economic sensitivity to systematic risk w has been the subject of several studies: Dietsch and Petey ( 2004) developed an approach based on the correlation between a borrower's assets; Bystrôm et al (2005) followed a deductive approach, calculating the default distance using the Merton model and then deducting the sensitivities of the systematic factors in relation to default distance; Düllmann and Scheule (2003) and Dietsch and Petey (2008) used the default transition probabilities matrices of borrowers; Düllmann et al (2007), La Porta et al (2002), calculated the correlation between the returns of listed and unlisted shares of borrowers; and Clauβen et al (2017) adopted the approach of Musto and Souleles (2006) by estimating the sensitivity to systematic risk by the CAPM-Beta model. They concluded that the borrower's systematic risk has been priced better beyond idiosyncratic factors and that it increases in crisis periods.…”
Section: Systematic Risk Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probablemente, el más simple, y uno de las más exitosos, sea el modelo de exponencial suavizada que puede expresarse como muestra la ecuación (6).…”
Section: Modelo De Correlación Condicional Dinámica (Dcc)unclassified