2004
DOI: 10.1080/01446190310001649010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation techniques for infrastructure investment decisions

Abstract: Public infrastructure owners are increasingly soliciting BOT arrangements to deliver needed infrastructure facilities. Such arrangements potentially preserve a public owner's capital capacity for allocation to projects that cannot support themselves by essentially 'pulling' projects from the private sector. Before soliciting these arrangements, however, owners should independently evaluate a project's economic viability to fully appraise the issues and variables involved. Unfortunately, project analysts often … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
69
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…If, regardless of what the actual loss turns out to be, the stipulated amount of compensation exceeds the probable loss, it is a penalty. 16 The scope of this section is to analyze the e¤ects of introducing a liquidated damages clause upon the parties'expected payo¤s.…”
Section: Liquidated Damagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If, regardless of what the actual loss turns out to be, the stipulated amount of compensation exceeds the probable loss, it is a penalty. 16 The scope of this section is to analyze the e¤ects of introducing a liquidated damages clause upon the parties'expected payo¤s.…”
Section: Liquidated Damagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The …rst is that on the real-option approach, which has been applied in several areas, but has not been extensively used to address procurement topics. The available works mostly focus on the evaluation, from a contractor's perspective, of a project embedding some elements of managerial ‡exibility (see, for example, Ford et al, 2002;Ho and Liu, 2002;Garvin and Cheah, 2004), without addressing the e¤ects of ‡exibility on agents' bidding behaviour. One of the few exceptions is the paper by You and Tam (2006) who, however, do not employ a game-theoretic framework to analyse how managerial discretion in ‡uences 3 Resolution 78(3) adopted by the Committee of Ministers on January 20, 1978.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we used the case study method to replicate most SID research conducted in order to determine the relevance of the factors influencing the success of SIDs to the eastern context. Similar to past SID research that uses single country variables [7], [8] Singapore as the main single country variable is used. To ensure reliability and validity in this research, care is taken to ensure consistency of organisations.…”
Section: A Case Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leviäkangas and Lähes-maa (2002) suggested the option approach is a useful valuation tool for intelligent transport system investments. Garvin and Cheah (2004) and Ford et al (2002) used a option pricing approach to quantify a deferment option in a toll road project and to value the design flexibility in an engineering project respectively. Wooldridge et al (2002) evaluated the flexibility in toll road project considering the option pricing theory with a case of Dulles Greenway.…”
Section: Applying Option Pricing Theory Into Infrastructure Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%