2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2010.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value and reliability of anthropometric measurements of cranial deformity in early childhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
6

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
75
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…It is quick and easy perform, and avoids any exposure to radiation or sedation as recently described by others (McKay et al, 2010;Schaaf et al, 2010;Wilbrand et al, 2011). Besides the accurate quantification of standard anthropometric parameters, the applicability of 3D photogrammetry for measuring cranial vault volume has been recently demonstrated, especially in comparison to CT scans as the gold standard (McKay et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It is quick and easy perform, and avoids any exposure to radiation or sedation as recently described by others (McKay et al, 2010;Schaaf et al, 2010;Wilbrand et al, 2011). Besides the accurate quantification of standard anthropometric parameters, the applicability of 3D photogrammetry for measuring cranial vault volume has been recently demonstrated, especially in comparison to CT scans as the gold standard (McKay et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…All children had been grouped by standard anthropometric calliper measurements (Wilbrand et al, 2010) into one of the three groups plagiocephaly, brachycephaly or a combination of both . 230 (56.1%) infants were diagnosed to be plagiocephalic, 32 (7.8%) were brachycephalic and 148 (36.1%) presented with a combination of plagiocephaly and brachycephaly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anthropometric indices have been successfully applied to assessing cranial deformity in Down syndrome, positional plagiocephaly, and brachycephaly. 6,21,22 Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated that anthropometric indices can be successfully used in the assessment of metopic synostosis. Kolar and Salter 10 assessed 24 anthropometric measurements in patients with trigonocephaly and calculated 11 cranial indices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The use of anthropometric cranial measurements has improved the precision and reliability of the assessment of other cranial deformities such as positional plagiocephaly, scaphocephaly, and brachycephaly. 21,22 The objective of this study was to describe the metopic index (MI), a simple anthropometric cranial measurement that can be obtained both from CT scans and from palpable cranial landmarks, as a rapid tool for evaluating patients with metopic synostosis in both pre-and postoperative settings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%