1999
DOI: 10.3905/jod.1999.319116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value at Risk For Derivatives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instances, SMCS requires heavy computational effort and involves large model risk while the performance of HS is poor if the amount of historical data is not large enough. For details about the implementation of VaR for non-linear portfolios, see El-Jahel et al (1999).…”
Section: Bayesian Var For Non-linear Portfoliosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instances, SMCS requires heavy computational effort and involves large model risk while the performance of HS is poor if the amount of historical data is not large enough. For details about the implementation of VaR for non-linear portfolios, see El-Jahel et al (1999).…”
Section: Bayesian Var For Non-linear Portfoliosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another shortcoming of VaR is that it may lead to some bizarre and suboptimal decisions if it is used as a binding constraint in portfolio selection (see [2]). VaR has been considered by both academia and practitioners as a measure for derivative risks, see, for example, Morgans Risk Metrics-Technical document [3,4]. However, due to the nonlinearity of derivative risks, the loss distribution of a derivative position may not be elliptical, and it is reasonable to question if VaR is appropriate as a measure for derivative risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the introduction of VaR, much effort has been placed on investigating VaR for derivatives. See, for example, J. P. Morgan (1996), Duffie andPan (1997), andEl-Jahel, Perraudin, andSellin (1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%