1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1085-7443(99)80074-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value creation in bundling utility mergers: A corporate focus anomaly

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, the results are mixed for the energy market. While Bacon et al (1997) and Burns et al (1998) observe an increase in performance after a merger, Khurana andPereira (2002), Becker-Blease et al (2008), as well as Ramos-Real et al (2010) find decreases in the post-merger operating performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Again, the results are mixed for the energy market. While Bacon et al (1997) and Burns et al (1998) observe an increase in performance after a merger, Khurana andPereira (2002), Becker-Blease et al (2008), as well as Ramos-Real et al (2010) find decreases in the post-merger operating performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Management synergies are a further possible motivation, where the superior management skills of the buying firm can be applied to the takeover target (Jensen, 1993;Gaughan, 2002). A number of studies of energy utilities in the US contain indications that the efficiency of energy utilities could indeed be increased as a result of takeovers (Bacon, 1997;Burns et al 1998;Kwoka, 2006;Fabrizio et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When cash flow is constant, value of enterprise is inversely proportional to risk. Value of enterprise is equal to present value of future cash flow plus present value of terminal value minus remanent debt in DCF theory [7]- [8] . The theory is based on three hypotheses as follows:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%