2005
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000179311.87137.0d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of Dermatomal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Detecting Acute Nerve Root Injury

Abstract: D-SSEP is valuable for detecting acute single nerve root injury. In clinical settings, submaximal dermatomal stimulation identifies conduction abnormalities more consistently and with fewer false negatives and false positives than does supramaximal stimulation. We recommend submaximal stimulation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tsai et al18) tried to detect nerve root injuries using a DSEP study in rats, and he reported that the sensitivity and specificity of the DSEP study was higher with submaximal stimulation intensity than with supramaximal stimulation intensity.. In our previous study13), we also reported that the diagnostic sensitivity of DSEP in lumbar radiculopathy patients could be enhanced by lowering the intensity of electrical stimulation as compared with the conventional intensity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Tsai et al18) tried to detect nerve root injuries using a DSEP study in rats, and he reported that the sensitivity and specificity of the DSEP study was higher with submaximal stimulation intensity than with supramaximal stimulation intensity.. In our previous study13), we also reported that the diagnostic sensitivity of DSEP in lumbar radiculopathy patients could be enhanced by lowering the intensity of electrical stimulation as compared with the conventional intensity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In general, the characteristic waveform of SSEP elicited by stimulating the tail nerves showed a typical initial small positive wave and a major negative wave (Figure 1), which is similar to the SSEP elicited using sciatic nerve stimulation reported elsewhere. 9,10 The descending and ascending NAP of tail nerves had a typical triphasic (positive, major negative, and positive) wave of similar latency, but in the descending recording we also recorded the large late responses after the initial triphasic NAP (Figures 2, 3). Baseline amplitude of SSEP and NAP, the latency of SSEP, and the nerve conduction velocity of NAP showed no significant differences between the 3 groups (Table 1).…”
Section: Electrophysiologic Findingsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Our work, in concordance with previous studies, supports the notion that SSEP monitoring alone can reduce postoperative paraplegia by 60% in spinal surgery. 15,18 However, SSEPs can remain completely normal during nerve root injury, owing to central amplification, 16,20,21 perhaps contributing to the relatively low sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%