2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of Implementation of Strategies to Increase the Adherence of Health Professionals and Cancer Survivors to Guideline-Based Physical Exercise

Abstract: All the ISTs for cancer survivors, except for financial incentives, had a positive TNB. The largest improvements in adherence were created by a motivational program for patients, followed by a reminder system for professionals.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Case studies, including ours, tend to focus on pharmaceuticals or medical devices, most likely due to the availability of published data and clearly defined patient populations. However, as exemplified by Hoomans and colleagues, [41][42][43][44] who estimated the value of guideline implementation, and Mewes et al, 45 who evaluated the value of increasing adherence to guideline-based physical exercise for cancer survivors, it is possible to apply the EVPIM framework to other and broader implementation assessments. Work has also shown how heterogeneous cost-effectiveness estimates may be addressed in the EVPIM framework 10,11 and the effect of nonlinear costs (e.g., cases where investment in new equipment is needed) and nonlinear effect (e.g., herd immunity from vaccinations) could also be accounted for in EVPIM estimations.…”
Section: Strength and Limitations Of The Proposed Subcategorization Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case studies, including ours, tend to focus on pharmaceuticals or medical devices, most likely due to the availability of published data and clearly defined patient populations. However, as exemplified by Hoomans and colleagues, [41][42][43][44] who estimated the value of guideline implementation, and Mewes et al, 45 who evaluated the value of increasing adherence to guideline-based physical exercise for cancer survivors, it is possible to apply the EVPIM framework to other and broader implementation assessments. Work has also shown how heterogeneous cost-effectiveness estimates may be addressed in the EVPIM framework 10,11 and the effect of nonlinear costs (e.g., cases where investment in new equipment is needed) and nonlinear effect (e.g., herd immunity from vaccinations) could also be accounted for in EVPIM estimations.…”
Section: Strength and Limitations Of The Proposed Subcategorization Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a formalized cooperation with oncology care will be essential (Schmitz et al, 2019). Future research on the implementation of PA programs should focus on how to improve collaboration between oncology care and health promotion and how to ensure that nurses and physicians working in oncology care promote PA for persons undergoing oncology treatment (Mewes et al, 2017;Schmitz et al, 2019;Segal et al, 2017).…”
Section: Implications and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods are available to quantify the expected value of the improved implementation of health care interventions using specified strategies, such as investing in the required equipment or staff knowledge. 23,24 Such approaches are henceforth referred to as “implementation strategies.” The evaluation of implementation strategies by estimating the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was originally proposed by Sculpher 25 in 2000 and further developed by Mason et al 26 in 2001. However, a move in 2007 to propose the use of the net benefit framework by Fenwick et al, 27 formulated by Walker et al, 28 allowed the calculation of the economic benefit of increasing implementation rather than a sole focus on quantifying the relative cost-effectiveness of specific implementation strategies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, there have been few actual applications of VOImp, and each has focused on estimating a “static” value, 23,24,32 and none has focused on the impact on precision medicine. Whyte et al 23 estimated the value of using a 2-hour training workshop for clinicians to increase the implementation of NICE guidelines for natriuretic peptide testing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation