2016
DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1133429
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of innovation for hematologic malignancies

Abstract: The improved transparency of decision models allows sharing of relevant structural and analytic parameters (i.e., time horizon, comparator treatments, hierarchy of end-point, assumptions, source of data, sub-group analyses) by stakeholders, physicians and patients, making health economics a noble 'translator' of values for innovation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1st, the results have no universal value because they depend on the time horizon adopted and country-specific drug costs. 43 2nd, our analyses used a 3 rd -party payer perspective but did not consider indirect costs from productivity loss, a relevant social burden for young persons with MM. 44 3rd, unit costs of treatments resembled ex-factory costs and not true acquisition costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1st, the results have no universal value because they depend on the time horizon adopted and country-specific drug costs. 43 2nd, our analyses used a 3 rd -party payer perspective but did not consider indirect costs from productivity loss, a relevant social burden for young persons with MM. 44 3rd, unit costs of treatments resembled ex-factory costs and not true acquisition costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%