2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of laboratory results in addition to vital signs in a machine learning algorithm to predict in-hospital cardiac arrest: A single-center retrospective cohort study

Abstract: Background Although machine learning-based prediction models for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) have been widely investigated, it is unknown whether a model based on vital signs alone (Vitals-Only model) can perform similarly to a model that considers both vital signs and laboratory results (Vitals+Labs model). Methods All adult patients hospitalized in a tertiary care hospital in Japan between October 2011 and October 2018 were included in this study. Random forest models with/without laboratory results (V… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In many of these studies the predicted outcome was a defined event that could be easily detected, such as mortality, cardiac arrest, or ICU transfer. In other cases, the predicted end-point was a more complex condition, such as renal failure or sepsis, that required a rule-based algorithm for event tagging [16][17][18][19][20][21]. In most studies, although the rules for event tagging were specified, no details as to the reliability of the tagging, manual or automatic, were provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many of these studies the predicted outcome was a defined event that could be easily detected, such as mortality, cardiac arrest, or ICU transfer. In other cases, the predicted end-point was a more complex condition, such as renal failure or sepsis, that required a rule-based algorithm for event tagging [16][17][18][19][20][21]. In most studies, although the rules for event tagging were specified, no details as to the reliability of the tagging, manual or automatic, were provided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system predicted cardiac arrest using abnormal body temperature or heart rate [ 23 ]. Ueno Ryo et al developed algorithms to predict cardiac arrest based on RF in patients [ 24 ]. They collected 8-hourly vital signs and laboratory data for two days to obtain 24-h of data [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ueno Ryo et al developed algorithms to predict cardiac arrest based on RF in patients [ 24 ]. They collected 8-hourly vital signs and laboratory data for two days to obtain 24-h of data [ 24 ]. Sensitivity was higher when only vital signs were used, but the use of vital signs and laboratory data gave a higher positive predictive value (PPV) [ 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to vital signs alone, laboratory indicators increase the ability to identify patients at risk of deterioration [14]. In spite of that, the di culty in obtaining laboratory indicators limits the application of the prediction [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%