2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2011.10.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Nodal Staging in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The software-based fusion of PET and MRI sets and the required rebedding of all patients between two scans might impact the precision of the coregistration images and might bias lymph node metastasis detection and N-staging [12]. These disadvantages of software-based fusion images could be overcome by integrated PET/MRI [23]. The patient selection criteria of these studies are different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The software-based fusion of PET and MRI sets and the required rebedding of all patients between two scans might impact the precision of the coregistration images and might bias lymph node metastasis detection and N-staging [12]. These disadvantages of software-based fusion images could be overcome by integrated PET/MRI [23]. The patient selection criteria of these studies are different.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…To date, several reports have indicated that DWI is a useful method in the differentiation of metastatic from non-metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with head and neck tumours, on the basis that it provides a more detailed characterization of tissue at both a microscopic level and in terms of an actual pathological process. [7][8][9] However, studies exploiting DWI to distinguish metastatic from benign RLNs in patients with NPC are limited. Here, DWI was evaluated as a possible clinical strategy to differentiate metastatic from non-metastatic RLNs in patients with NPC and compared with the current standard of size-based criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent meta‐analysis on the value of MRI for nodal staging in patients with HNSCC showed that the subgroup of MRI with diffusion‐weighted imaging had a significantly higher pooled sensitivity (86%; 95% CI = 78–92) than conventional MRI (71%; 95% CI = 68–79). The specificity was similar: 95%; CI = 93–97 and 95%; 95% CI = 92–97, respectively …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 81%