2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2017.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of MDCT as a non- invasive modality in evaluation of pediatric congenital cardiovascular anomalies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

10
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
10
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding great vessels anomalies, we found good agreement between Echo and MDCT where k measuring 0.790. This is in agreement with Shehata et al who reported that there is good agreement was obtained for complex vascular anomalies where k measuring 0.776 (6) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding great vessels anomalies, we found good agreement between Echo and MDCT where k measuring 0.790. This is in agreement with Shehata et al who reported that there is good agreement was obtained for complex vascular anomalies where k measuring 0.776 (6) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is in agreement with Goitein et al who reported that MDCT yielded additional diagnostic information in case of MAPCAs by 92% since only one case was detectable by echocardiography out of 12 diagnosed by MDCT (13) . As regard extracardiac findings in our study, lung changes that were seen in MDCT in form of lung consolidation in three cases (10%) and one case of unilateral lung hypoplasia (3.3 %).This is in agreement with Shehata et al who reported that MDCT is superior to echocardiography in diagnosis of associated pulmonary lesions like; atelectasis, pneumonia, pulmonary edema, pulmonary embolism and pneumothorax unsurprisingly, in our study airway abnormalities were only detected by MDCT (6) .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anomalies in coronary artery origin were detected in 10.9% of the studied cases with good agreement between CT coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography (K value = 0.630), this percentage is comparable to Shehata et al [10], who found those anomalous in 7.4% of the studied cases with very poor agreement between CTA and ICA results (K value <0.2). This difference in agreement may be attributed to missing the non selective aortic injection of contrast medium during the procedure of ICA and also the outcomes are operator dependent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The MDCT angiography has been an escalating modality being preferred nowadays. Not only the anatomic information, MDCT also provides hemodynamic information, including extra-cardiac, intra-cardiac shunts and valvular diseases (7). The MDCT has advantage over catheter angiography in using less radiation and contrast dose.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%