2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.11.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide as a marker for rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others also have reported more recently an association between plasma BNP and cardiac cellular rejection [2831]. Similar findings were seen in pediatric cardiac allograft recipients [32, 33]. Finally, plasma BNP or NT-proBNP levels in postcardiac transplantation strongly and independently predicted cardiac mortality [34, 35].…”
Section: Plasma Bnp In Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejectionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Others also have reported more recently an association between plasma BNP and cardiac cellular rejection [2831]. Similar findings were seen in pediatric cardiac allograft recipients [32, 33]. Finally, plasma BNP or NT-proBNP levels in postcardiac transplantation strongly and independently predicted cardiac mortality [34, 35].…”
Section: Plasma Bnp In Acute Cardiac Allograft Rejectionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Sequential values appear to be of greater value than a single measurement. This was also shown for cardiac transplant patients—the change of NT-proBNP over time correlated with their wellbeing, not the absolute value [22, 23]. The baseline value may be of prognostic significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Prior reports on pediatric patients have also found a relationship between graft pathology and BNP levels; however, those reports were limited by small numbers of patients and few episodes of graft rejection. 28,29 It is of interest to note that some patients are clinically stable and have elevated BNP levels without evidence of AR. This may reflect sub-clinical evidence of graft dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%