1992
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(92)90126-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of radiograph audit in an accident service department

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These have usually been undertaken to determine whether it may be appropriate for such individuals to provisionally report radiological studies and therefore help to meet the increasing demand for on-call radiology. For instance, several studies have evaluated the discrepancy rates between radiologists and emergency doctors in reporting trauma radiographs, demonstrating misreporting rates in the region of 1-3% [5][6][7]. In the context of cranial CT, previous studies have assessed the clinically significant non-concordance rates between the reports of radiology trainees and neuroradiologists, showing these to be between 1.7% and 5.7% [8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These have usually been undertaken to determine whether it may be appropriate for such individuals to provisionally report radiological studies and therefore help to meet the increasing demand for on-call radiology. For instance, several studies have evaluated the discrepancy rates between radiologists and emergency doctors in reporting trauma radiographs, demonstrating misreporting rates in the region of 1-3% [5][6][7]. In the context of cranial CT, previous studies have assessed the clinically significant non-concordance rates between the reports of radiology trainees and neuroradiologists, showing these to be between 1.7% and 5.7% [8][9][10].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Misdiagnosis in the A&E department is an apparently common and potentially serious problem, and previous studies have found that misdiagnosis rates by A&E staV range from 0.6% to 7%. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Failure to interpret radiographic images correctly is a common cause of diagnostic error and litigation in the A&E department. 6 14 Radiology departments have begun to make use of new technology known as Picture Archiving and Communications System (PACS) that acquires, transports and stores radiographic images electronically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results compare well with the published results in other studies and are in the lower part of the range of these results . They are also similar to the misdiagnosis rate of 1.4% found by Thomas et al (1992) at the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford which is another British teaching hospital with some characteristics similar to the Hammersmith and which is being used as one of the comparator hospitals in the evaluation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%