2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-017-2611-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gout in patients presenting with acute arthritis

Abstract: When the prevalence is high, these three ultrasound features may be a useful adjunct in the diagnosis of acute gout, particularly when specialized microscopic techniques are not available.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Snowstorm appearance is suggestive of floating hyperechoic monosodium urate crystals or hyperechoic aggregation within the joint or along the tendons could indicate tophi [10]. Ultrasonography may help in the differential diagnosis of acute arthritis when special microscopic technical experience is not available [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Snowstorm appearance is suggestive of floating hyperechoic monosodium urate crystals or hyperechoic aggregation within the joint or along the tendons could indicate tophi [10]. Ultrasonography may help in the differential diagnosis of acute arthritis when special microscopic technical experience is not available [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joint effusions in gout may range from simple, anechoic fluid to heterogeneous hyperechoic collection with synovitis ( Figure 7 a, Figure 8 b, Figure 9 , Figure 10 a,b and Figure 11 a) [ 17 , 28 , 65 ]. MSU crystal aggregates/microtophi can be seen in the joint as floating echogenic foci, known as the “snowstorm appearance” ( Figure 7 a) [ 7 , 9 , 13 , 15 , 17 , 18 , 28 , 29 , 31 , 36 , 59 , 65 , 66 , 67 ]. These echogenic foci could represent joint bodies, and US cannot differentiate MSU crystals from calcifications; DECT can be utilized for this [ 13 ].…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MSU crystals also precipitate on the superficial layer of the hyaline cartilage, producing an irregular hyperechoic line over the anechoic cartilage. This hyperechoic line parallels the hyperechoic line of the subchondral bone, separated by anechoic cartilage, producing the “double contour sign” ( Figure 8 c and Figure 9 ) [ 7 , 9 , 13 , 15 , 17 , 18 , 29 , 31 , 36 , 46 , 57 , 59 , 65 , 66 , 67 ]. OMERACT defined the double contour sign as “abnormal hyperechoic band over the superficial margin of the articular hyaline cartilage, independent of the angle of insonation and which may be either irregular or regular, continuous or intermittent and can be distinguished from the cartilage interface sign” [ 63 ].…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US were 65.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62.0∼68.2) and 89.0% (95% CI, 96.6∼91.1), respectively (Table 1, Figure 1). The PLR, NLR, and DOR were 5.889 (3.365∼10.30), 0.359 (0.266∼ 0.485), and 17.61 (11.11∼17.92), respectively (Table 2) [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40]. The AUC of US was 0.858 and the Q* index was 0.789, indicating good diagnostic accuracy (Table 1, Figure 2).…”
Section: An Example Of a Meta-analysis Of Diagnostic Test Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%