2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.07.393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Value of viscosity, viscoelasticity and attenuation measurement using shear wave ultrasound elastography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another quantitative parameter of liver damage that was evaluated was shear‐wave dispersion (SWD), which is indicative of liver viscosity, and has shown potential to be an indicator of inflammatory processes within the liver. 41 , 42 Ultrasound frequency influences shear wave speed and the measurement of the level of dependency of shear waves to frequency is called dispersion. This in turn is correlated to viscosity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another quantitative parameter of liver damage that was evaluated was shear‐wave dispersion (SWD), which is indicative of liver viscosity, and has shown potential to be an indicator of inflammatory processes within the liver. 41 , 42 Ultrasound frequency influences shear wave speed and the measurement of the level of dependency of shear waves to frequency is called dispersion. This in turn is correlated to viscosity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values of this parameter are expressed in dB/cm/MHz and it also has a parameter of the quality of acquisition, that must be higher than R 2 >0.90( Figure 6a). In a preliminary study in which ATI was compared with CAP (FibroScan, EchoSens), in a cohort of 113 consecutive subjects [25], a strong positive correlation was found between the attenuation coefficients of steatosis obtained by the 2 methods, r = 0.81, p < 0.001. Using CAP as reference, the AUROCs of ATI for ≥S1, ≥S2 and ≥S3 were excellent (0.89, 0.88, respectively 0.95, p < 0.001) and the proposed cut-off values for were: S1 = 0.64 dB/cm/mHz, S2 = 0.79 dB/cm/mHz and S3 = 0.86 dB/cm/mHz.…”
Section: Attenuation Image (Ati)mentioning
confidence: 96%