1990
DOI: 10.2307/2786958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Values and Intergroup Social Motives: A Study of Israeli and German Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
2
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
4
78
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It has proved its fruitfulness in a number of domains, including prediction of behavior (Bardi & Schwartz, 2003), trust in institutions (Devos, Spini & Schwartz, 2002), or intergroup relations (Schwartz, Struch, & Bilsky, 1990). Schwartz and his colleagues , 2005a, 2005bSchwartz et al, 2001;Schwartz & Sagiv, 1995) have conducted research in almost 50 languages, revealing a close to universal set of values differentiated by motivational content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has proved its fruitfulness in a number of domains, including prediction of behavior (Bardi & Schwartz, 2003), trust in institutions (Devos, Spini & Schwartz, 2002), or intergroup relations (Schwartz, Struch, & Bilsky, 1990). Schwartz and his colleagues , 2005a, 2005bSchwartz et al, 2001;Schwartz & Sagiv, 1995) have conducted research in almost 50 languages, revealing a close to universal set of values differentiated by motivational content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These theories focus on perceptions of other groups as failing to uphold moral values, and as willing to break the law and violating basic principles of fairness in order to benefit themselves. Schwartz and Struch (1989; see also Schwartz, Struch, & Bilsky, 1990) have suggested that certain values, particularly prosocial values, are seen as hallmarks of the degree to which people have transcended their prehuman origins and have developed moral sensibilities. To the extent that a group is seen as failing to uphold these values, and thus as immoral, the group is likely to be seen as less than human, and thus as less deserving of humane treatment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We assume that there are more cultural similarities than differences with respect to psychologically relevant variables between the two Western and the two South-East Asian cultural samples, respectively. The Israeli and German urban areas are rather similar in respect to technological and economic advancement and related development of urbanization and family structure; both cultures share Western individualistic values of autonomy and independence (for Israel see Schwartz, Struch, & Bilsky, 1990; for Germany see Hofstede, 2000;Inglehart, 1990). In contrast, the Indonesian and Malaysian cultures (both including several ethnic groups) share similarities with respect to religion (Islam), economic, and technological development (low urbanization), and widely held non-Western values of social orientation, relatedness, and "symbiotic harmony" (Rothbaum, Pott, Azuma, Miyake, & Weisz, 2000) (for Indonesia, especially Java, see MagnisSuseno, 1997;Mulder, 1992; for Malaysia, especially Sarawak, see Essau, 1992;Essau & Trommsdorff, 1996).…”
Section: Cultural Groups and Their Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%