Values at stake: autonomy, responsibility, and trustworthiness in relation to genetic testing and personalized nutrition advice

Abstract

Personalized nutrition has the potential to enhance individual health control. It could be seen as a means to strengthen people's autonomy as they learn more about their personal health risks, and receive dietary advice accordingly. We examine in what sense personalized nutrition strengthens or weakens individual autonomy. The impact of personalized nutrition on autonomy is analyzed in relation to responsibility and trustworthiness. On a societal level, individualization of health promotion may be accompanied by the attribution of extended individual responsibility for one's health. This constitutes a dilemma of individualization, caused by a conflict between the right to individual freedom and societal interests. The extent to which personalized nutrition strengthens autonomy is consequently influenced by how responsibility for health is allocated to individuals. Ethically adequate allocation of responsibility should focus on prospective responsibility and be differentiated with regard to individual differences concerning the capacity of adults to take responsibility. The impact of personalized nutrition on autonomy also depends on its methodological design. Owing to the complexity of information received, personalized nutrition through genetic testing (PNTGT) is open to misinterpretation and may not facilitate informed choices and autonomy. As new technologies, personalized nutrition and PNTGT are subject to issues of trust. To strengthen autonomy, trust should be approached in terms of trustworthiness. Trustworthiness implies that an organization that develops or introduces personalized nutrition can show that it is competent to deal with both the technical and moral dimensions at stake and that its decisions are motivated by the interests and expectations of the truster.Keywords Personalized nutrition Á Ethics Á Autonomy Á Responsibility Á Trustworthiness This study was conducted on behalf of the Food4Me project.Food4Me is the acronym of the EU FP7 project: ''Personalised nutrition: an integrated analysis of opportunities and challenges''

From Expectations to Experiences: Consumer Autonomy and Choice in Personal Genomic Testing

“…To this end, as well as adding to the body of qualitative research on PGT, our study findings can contribute to ongoing bioethics debates about (consumer or personal) autonomy in relation to PGT. 1 Personal autonomy, together with related concepts such as personal utility and empowerment, has received some consideration in the PGT literature (Beckman 2004;Juengst, Flatt, and Settersten 2012;Nordstrom et al 2013;Bunnik 2015;Bunnik, Janssens, and Schermer 2015;Vayena 2015;Loi 2016;Turrini and Prainsack 2016). Two questions are particularly relevant.…”

Guide and Position of the International Society of Nutrigenetics/Nutrigenomics on Personalized Nutrition: Part 2 - Ethics, Challenges and Endeavors of Precision Nutrition

“…Other authors have shown that computer-tailored nutrition education had benefits in individual motivation to change diet [140]. However, in ethical terms, autonomy and responsibility should be distributed according to the ability of the patient to handle them [141]. …”

Nutrigenetics and Personalized Nutrition: Are we Ready for Dna-Based Dietary Advice?

“…• Further reductions in costs will make genotyping routine and DNA-based dietary advice will become part of standard recommendations -where the evidence is supportive. and application of advanced metabolic profiling techniques [3,84,85]. It is inevitable that genotyping will become ever more widespread as costs reduce even further and ethical issues are addressed -this will overcome one of the significant barriers to widespread use of DNAbased dietary advice by health professionals: the cost and time required for genotyping.…”