2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2880-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Values encoded in orbitofrontal cortex are causally related to economic choices

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
53
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
11
53
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The decision of navigational goal requires a choice among available positions. This is consistent with a previously suggested role for the OFC in choice decisions based on prior history of choices and subsequent outcomes 21 24 . The representation of spatial goal, however, needs to satisfy additional cognitive demand for navigation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The decision of navigational goal requires a choice among available positions. This is consistent with a previously suggested role for the OFC in choice decisions based on prior history of choices and subsequent outcomes 21 24 . The representation of spatial goal, however, needs to satisfy additional cognitive demand for navigation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…If so, greater randomness in the value-based choice process would increase the rate at which suicide is selected. The notion that value-based choice is disrupted in people at risk for suicide is supported by the IGT findings reviewed earlier and, indirectly, by postmortem and early autoradiographic findings of alterations in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (Amen et al, 2009;Arango et al, 1997;Oquendo et al, 2003) subserving construction and comparison of values in both learning and revealed preference paradigms (Ballesta et al, 2020;Bartra et al, 2013;Chase et al, 2015). The idea that suicide reflects a stochastic choice is not new.…”
Section: Choice Processesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Supplementary Table 1 lists the delay durations of all trials. Specifically, there were six delay durations in the experience trials (10,15,20,40, 45, and 50 s). The short-delay condition comprised of the 10-, 15-, and 20-s delays, and the long-delay condition consisted of the 40-, 45-, and 50-s delays.…”
Section: Behavioral Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%