1986
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860501)57:9<1836::aid-cncr2820570922>3.0.co;2-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Values of carcinoembryonic antigen, elastase 1, and carbohydrate antigen determinant in aspirated pancreatic cystic fluid in the diagnosis of cysts of the pancreas

Abstract: The levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), elastase 1, and carbohydrate antigen determinant (CA 19-9) in the pancreatic cystic fluid and the serum from five patients with cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas, one patient with retention cyst due to pancreatic carcinoma, three patients with cystadenoma, and eight patients with benign pseudocyst accompanying or following pancreatitis, were determined by immunoassay technique. Fluid from pancreatic cysts was obtained by ultrasonically-guided percutaneous fine-nee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Subsequent studies showed that CEA levels were elevated in the pancreatic cyst fluid. 18,19 In 2004, a multicenter, blinded study by Brugge et al 20 showed that, at an optimal cutoff of 192 ng/mL, cyst fluid CEA levels were capable of differentiating an MCN from an NMCN with a high degree of accuracy (sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 84%). However, subsequent small case series have shown that CEA levels may not be accurate as previously reported (sensitivity of 28%-100%, specificity of 25%-100%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Subsequent studies showed that CEA levels were elevated in the pancreatic cyst fluid. 18,19 In 2004, a multicenter, blinded study by Brugge et al 20 showed that, at an optimal cutoff of 192 ng/mL, cyst fluid CEA levels were capable of differentiating an MCN from an NMCN with a high degree of accuracy (sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 84%). However, subsequent small case series have shown that CEA levels may not be accurate as previously reported (sensitivity of 28%-100%, specificity of 25%-100%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Cytological analysis can provide much useful preoperative information to help in the diagnosis of cystic neoformations, based on levels of pancreatic enzymes, and tumoral markers (CEA, CA 19-9) in cystic fluid obtained by fine-needle cytology. [23][24][25][26][27] Only the case reported by Nigaard and Stacy 2 described an elevated concentration of pancreatic enzymes in cystic liquid. In ten patients this concentration was comparable to that of the serum levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This antigen has been detected in various body fluids such as the gastrointestinal and pancreatobiliary juice (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). Several studies have described the diagnostic utility of the increased CEA levels in the body fluids in primary malignant tumors arising from the stomach, colon, biliary tract, and pancreas (4-11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the performance of the available tumor markers as screening tests for diagnosing a malignancy in high risk individuals is inadequate because of the reduced sensitivity and occasional false-positive results (1)(2)(3). However, several studies have suggested that measuring the CEA in the body fluid bathing primary or metastatic tumors may be more useful than the serum value (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic role of the bile CEA levels in patients with bile duct cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%