2020
DOI: 10.1002/pra2.212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Values, risks, and power influencing librarians' decisions to host drag queen storytime

Abstract: This paper reports preliminary qualitative findings from a survey of public library staff who work at libraries that have and have not hosted drag queen storytimes (DQS), a popular but contested children's program. Three constructs—values, risks, and power—are developed to describe how individual, library, and institutional forces combine to determine whether DQS occur. Findings contribute to limited scholarly work on DQS by including locations that have not hosted DQS and by engaging critically with how insti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Public libraries serve as contested sites for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex and asexual (LGBTQIA+) [1] individuals due to larger sociopolitical forces that limit their ability to provide affirming resources and services. Examples include political figures attempting to ban and criminalize drag story times (Floegel et al , 2020; Rojas et al , 2023; Wexelbaum, 2016), backlash by conservative organizations against libraries engaging in explicitly pro-LGBTQIA+ events (Jaeger et al , 2022; Ellis, 2022) and book bans that pathologize LGBTQIA+-themed books and materials as obscene (Pavenick and Martinez, 2022). Unfortunately, these forces can lead to exclusionary practices that create barriers to community engagement within library walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public libraries serve as contested sites for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, questioning, intersex and asexual (LGBTQIA+) [1] individuals due to larger sociopolitical forces that limit their ability to provide affirming resources and services. Examples include political figures attempting to ban and criminalize drag story times (Floegel et al , 2020; Rojas et al , 2023; Wexelbaum, 2016), backlash by conservative organizations against libraries engaging in explicitly pro-LGBTQIA+ events (Jaeger et al , 2022; Ellis, 2022) and book bans that pathologize LGBTQIA+-themed books and materials as obscene (Pavenick and Martinez, 2022). Unfortunately, these forces can lead to exclusionary practices that create barriers to community engagement within library walls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Understanding library staff motivations for and perceptions of hosting DQS also provides insight into larger conversations about the field's values, power, and decision-making, such as whether libraries can or should be neutral. 8…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%