2017
DOI: 10.1257/aer.20161500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing Alternative Work Arrangements

Abstract: We employ a discrete choice experiment in the employment process for a national call center to estimate the willingness to pay distribution for alternative work arrangements relative to traditional office positions. Most workers are not willing to pay for scheduling flexibility, though a tail of workers with high valuations allows for sizable compensating differentials. The average worker is willing to give up 20 percent of wages to avoid a schedule set by an employer on short notice, and 8 percent for the opt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

25
279
3
13

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 580 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
25
279
3
13
Order By: Relevance
“…At the federal level, lawmakers debated whether or how the government should encourage flexible work arrangements (Council of Economic Advisers, 2015). These debates centered on extending policies on overtime in the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Family Medical Leave Act (Mas & Pallais, 2017) but have not resulted in any modifications to existing legislation. Congress also responded by introducing the Flexibility for Working Families Act in 2013 and the Schedules that Work Act in 2017.…”
Section: Flexible Work Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the federal level, lawmakers debated whether or how the government should encourage flexible work arrangements (Council of Economic Advisers, 2015). These debates centered on extending policies on overtime in the Fair Labor Standards Act and the Family Medical Leave Act (Mas & Pallais, 2017) but have not resulted in any modifications to existing legislation. Congress also responded by introducing the Flexibility for Working Families Act in 2013 and the Schedules that Work Act in 2017.…”
Section: Flexible Work Arrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We find that whilst entering solo self-employment leads to lower earnings than employee jobs -as much of the recent literature suggests -individuals also experience an improvement in well-being. This provides an alternative perspective to the value of solo self-employment, in terms of psychological benefits that compensate for lower earnings, that complements recent work using studies of willingness to pay to elicit the value of alternative work arrangements (Boeri et al, 2020;Datta, 2019;Mas and Pallais, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…With a wider labor pool to pick from, employers could potentially push the wage rate from WFH labor lower. As Mas & Pallais (2017) found, an average worker is willing to give up 8 percent of wages for WFH. This percentage could be much higher facing a pandemic health threat and high unemployment.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(1) through (4) using daily data presented in Table 3 (Mas & Pallais 2017) and better control of their schedules, but also better health with limited exposure to virus or bacteria; on the other hand, workers without digital skills or digital access often conduct relatively low-paid jobs, remain a life demanded by their bosses' schedules, and more importantly, always at the front line to be exposed to any transmutable disease, virus, germs. Dingel & Neiman (2020)'s contribution on teleworkable jobs offered the timely and critical contribution in the pandemic.…”
Section: Robustness Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%