1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00057-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing health status using VAS and TTO: What lies behind the numbers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
106
1
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
7
106
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the same phenomenon regarding the ranking of Dead has been observed when TTO tasks preceded rank/VAS (Tsuchiya et al, 2006). An alternative explanation is that participants might think of rank/VAS as some chronological or logical sequence: we get less healthy, and then we die, so dead is placed at the bottom (Robinson et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the same phenomenon regarding the ranking of Dead has been observed when TTO tasks preceded rank/VAS (Tsuchiya et al, 2006). An alternative explanation is that participants might think of rank/VAS as some chronological or logical sequence: we get less healthy, and then we die, so dead is placed at the bottom (Robinson et al, 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Robinson and colleagues 63 found that respondents in a TTO study may use a 'threshold of tolerability' to establish whether a state is severe enough for them to trade any time. In qualitative work, it has been found that respondents to a DCE study introduced additional information and assumptions to help them answer the questions.…”
Section: Influences On Responses To Health-state Valuation Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient is asked to score their current global quality of life as a number between 0 (completely dissatisfied) and 100 (completely satisfied). Despite its simplicity and ambiguous definition of quality of life, the Verbal Analogue-Scale provides a useful global assessment of current quality of life and can reveal finer quantitative differences than descriptive terms [25,26]. Norm sample results show means ranging 75.5±77.6 (standard deviation 15.1±18.2).…”
Section: Quality Of Life Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%