2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing improvements to threatened and endangered marine species: An application of stated preference choice experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a person may place a high value on the protection of endangered species, or on preventing them from going extinct, which means taking steps to achieve these goals can increase her/his utility. This value is often called a non-use or existence value by economists [11,[14][15][16]. In this regard, the economic value of various endangered species has been examined in numerous studies during the past two decades.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, a person may place a high value on the protection of endangered species, or on preventing them from going extinct, which means taking steps to achieve these goals can increase her/his utility. This value is often called a non-use or existence value by economists [11,[14][15][16]. In this regard, the economic value of various endangered species has been examined in numerous studies during the past two decades.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The economic value of Steller sea lions was a maximum of USD 204 per household per year [18]. The mean willingness of US households to pay for improving only the status of the Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus schauinslandi) from endangered to recovered was USD 68.12 per year [11]. Boxall et al [19] estimated the economic values of marine mammal species, such as beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas), harbor seals (Phoca vitulina), and blue whale (Balaenoptera musculus) found in the St. Lawrence Estuary in Canada, and found that they ranged from USD 77 to 229 per household per year.…”
Section: A Brief Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a similar framework, Wallmo and Lew (2011) and Lew and Wallmo (2011) present values associated with improving the ESA status of three TER species, the Puget Sound Chinook salmon, smalltooth sawfish, and the Hawaiian monk seal, using a small web-based national sample in the United States. Additionally, Lew and Wallmo (2011) show that non-consumptive values for these species are sensitive to scope, both in terms of the number of species protected and the amount of improvement (measured in terms of status improvement).…”
Section: A Wtp Is Reported In 2013 Us Dollars (All Values Convertedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using data from an expanded survey effort using the same web-based survey framework, Wallmo and Lew (2012) estimated a pooled model of surveys that each asked respondents to value ESA improvements to three of eight species. The eight species included those valued in Lew and Wallmo (2011) and Wallmo and Lew (2011), as well as the North Atlantic right whale, North Pacific right whale, leatherback sea turtle, loggerhead sea turtle, and Upper Willamette River Chinook salmon 20 . The most recent CEbased study is a follow-up to the Wallmo and Lew (2012) study that presents the public's WTP for recovering each of eight additional TER marine species, including several noncharismatic species (Wallmo and Lew, 2015).…”
Section: A Wtp Is Reported In 2013 Us Dollars (All Values Convertedmentioning
confidence: 99%