2015
DOI: 10.15414/raae.2015.18.02.40-50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing Soil Conservation Practices Using Contingent Valuation Technique: Evidence From the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia

Abstract: Land degradation mainly in the form of soil and nutrient depletion is the prominent problem that the Ethiopian agriculture is facing. Due to this, farmers should be aware of this problem and the necessity of implementing conservation measures. Hence, this study assesses farm households' willingness to participate in soil conservation practice through a Contingent Valuation method in one of the most degraded parts of the country. Double Bounded Dichotomous choice with an Open-ended follow up format was used to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Citizens of a given country differ importantly in this valuation (Cicatiello et al, 2020; Getzner et al, 2018). Citizens of the Global North differ even more from those of the Global South, who would above all seek to attain a higher standard of living (Ahmed et al, 2015; Gordillo et al, 2019). Also, the subjective trade‐off between the costs of controlling climate change now and the benefit accruing later is likely biased even more towards the present in the South than in the North.…”
Section: A Second Crucial Misunderstandingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Citizens of a given country differ importantly in this valuation (Cicatiello et al, 2020; Getzner et al, 2018). Citizens of the Global North differ even more from those of the Global South, who would above all seek to attain a higher standard of living (Ahmed et al, 2015; Gordillo et al, 2019). Also, the subjective trade‐off between the costs of controlling climate change now and the benefit accruing later is likely biased even more towards the present in the South than in the North.…”
Section: A Second Crucial Misunderstandingmentioning
confidence: 99%