Valuing the Benefits of Rock Climbing and the Welfare Gains from Decreasing Injury Risk

BACKGROUND Wilderness activities expose outdoor enthusiasts to austere environments with injury potential, including falls from height. The majority of published data on falls while climbing or hiking are from emergency departments. We sought to more accurately describe the injury pattern of wilderness falls that lead to serious injury requiring trauma center evaluation and to further distinguish climbing as a unique pattern of injury. METHODS Data were collected from 17 centers in 11 states on all wilderness falls (fall from cliff: International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, e884.1; International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, w15.xx) from 2006 to 2018 as a Western Trauma Association multicenter investigation. Demographics, injury characteristics, and care delivery were analyzed. Comparative analyses were performed for climbing versus nonclimbing mechanisms. RESULTS Over the 13-year study period, 1,176 wilderness fall victims were analyzed (301 climbers, 875 nonclimbers). Fall victims were male (76%), young (33 years), and moderately injured (Injury Severity Score, 12.8). Average fall height was 48 ft, and average rescue/transport time was 4 hours. Nineteen percent were intoxicated. The most common injury regions were soft tissue (57%), lower extremity (47%), head (40%), and spine (36%). Nonclimbers had a higher incidence of severe head and facial injuries despite having equivalent overall Injury Severity Score. On multivariate analysis, climbing remained independently associated with increased need for surgery but lower odds of composite intensive care unit admission/death. Contrary to studies of urban falls, height of fall in wilderness falls was not independently associated with mortality or Injury Severity Score. CONCLUSION Wilderness falls represent a unique population with distinct patterns of predominantly soft tissue, head, and lower extremity injury. Climbers are younger, usually male, more often discharged home, and require more surgery but less critical care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Epidemiological, Level IV.

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Valuing the Benefits of Rock Climbing and the Welfare Gains from Decreasing Injury Risk

Cited by 2 publications

References 30 publications

Do risk perception and safety of sites influence rock climbing destination choices?

Do risk perception and safety of sites influence rock climbing destination choices?

Into the wild and on to the table: A Western Trauma Association multicenter analysis and comparison of wilderness falls in rock climbers and nonclimbers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About