2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2022.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing the contributions of non-native species to people and nature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, it may be interesting to include in future questionnaires the perception regarding the positive–negative impacts ( e.g. , costs-benefits, ecosystem services-disservices) of the species, instead of focusing only on the negative ones (Vaz et al 2017 ; Sax et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, it may be interesting to include in future questionnaires the perception regarding the positive–negative impacts ( e.g. , costs-benefits, ecosystem services-disservices) of the species, instead of focusing only on the negative ones (Vaz et al 2017 ; Sax et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critics of the invasion metaphor have argued, however, that promoting militaristic relationships to species is anathema to compassionate identification and care for nature, and are concerned that normalising an ‘us‐versus‐them’ approach to valuing life will spill over into human relationships, invoking xenophobic or nationalistic tendencies, for example (Larson, 2011; Morris, 2020; Warren, 2021). Furthermore, what a conservationist might call an ‘invasive’ species might be to Australian Indigenous elders ‘cheeky’ kin, or to American Indigenous tradition bearers ‘wandering nations’ (Bach & Larson, 2017; Reo & Ogden, 2018), or to yet others ‘valued introduced species’ (Sax et al, 2022).…”
Section: The Social Lives Of Three Freshwater Metaphorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, what a conservationist might call an 'invasive' species might be to Australian Indigenous elders 'cheeky' kin, or to American Indigenous tradition bearers 'wandering nations' (Bach & Larson, 2017;Reo & Ogden, 2018), or to yet others 'valued introduced species' (Sax et al, 2022).…”
Section: Invasive Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These knowledge gaps occur because there are many inaccessible, nonmonetised, and missing costs, alongside costs from sources that are difficult to assess (e.g., grey literature such as internal reports) . The presence of benefits alongside costs has also been contested, given that InvaCost only focuses on assessing costs (Sagoff 2020;Boltovskoy et al 2022;Sax et al 2022). Part of this criticism relates to the fact that innocuous species, ancillary costs, and failed eradication programmes are potentially dominating and/or biassing cost analyses at present.…”
Section: Benefits Alongside Costs Of Biological Invasionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the argument that the presence of benefits lessens the importance or risks conveyed by invasive species does a disservice to natural resource managers and conservation practitioners, and conveys large risks to conservation programs and human wellbeing. This lack of knowledge about the magnitude, origin and distribution of benefits of invasive alien species has been inappropriately used to undermine or refute existing and synthesised estimates of costs (Boltovskoy et al 2022;Sax et al 2022).…”
Section: Benefits Alongside Costs Of Biological Invasionsmentioning
confidence: 99%