Valuing the Welfare Cost of Forest Fires: a Life Satisfaction Approach

Abstract

Kountouris, Y., Remoundou, K. (2011). Valuing the Welfare Cost of Forest Fires: a Life Satisfaction Approach. Kyklos, 64 (4), 556-578.Sustainable natural resource management is at the core of the policy agenda, given the wide array of goods and services environmental resources generate, that significantly contribute to social welfare and productive capacity of modern economies. Likewise, there is a large policy interest in the monetization of the economic effects of environmental damages, to enable the design of response and mitigation strategies. This paper focuses on the valuation of the welfare losses from forest fires in the fire prone Mediterranean region applying the life-satisfaction approach. Detrimental effects on utility relate to morbidity, losses of marketed goods and impacts on forest goods and services. For our empirical investigation, we employ self-reported life satisfaction, income and other socio-economic information from the Eurobarometer Survey Series matched with data on the number and extent of forest fires at the regional level. To account for endogeneity, we instrument forest fire characteristics with the mean daily precipitation in the region during the fire season ( April to September). Our sample covers Portugal, Spain, Italy and the Mediterranean provinces of France, and spans from 1986-1993 and 2001-2003. We find that both forest fire incidence and forest fire extent have a significant negative effect on individual welfare. We estimate the monetary loss from an additional fire incident to be (sic)0.20 and the loss from burning an additional 100ha of forest at (sic)2.03 per household respectively. Nevertheless, the negative effect of forest fires on life satisfaction is significant only for the rural population. Results therefore provide useful insights on the detrimental effects of forest fires at the regional level for different segments of the population that should be accounted for in policy formulation.Peer reviewe

Concerns about the Euro and happiness in Germany during times of crisis

“…To illustrate the economic importance, studies in this field often provide a transformation of non-monetary effects into equivalent monetary figures (e.g., Carroll et al 2009;Luechinger 2009;Luechinger and Raschky 2009;Kountouris and Remoundou 2011). 4 While the study here is also motivated by the idea that subjective well-being is generally translatable and measurable in economic terms, the prime motivation comes from a different and more political viewpoint.…”

Appraising the Unhappiness Due to the Great East Japan Earthquake: Evidence From Weekly Panel Data on Subjective Well-Being

“…For example, in the case of a well-known disaster of Hurricane Katrina, as far as we know, there have been no studies that provide monetary estimates of psychological suffering, and only a few studies such as Kimball et al (2006), Rateau (2009), Rhodes (2010), andLaJoie et al (2010) have addressed well-being after the disaster. Luechinger and Raschky (2009) and Kountouris and Remoundou (2011) are the scarce examples of monetary evaluations of psychological suffering from natural disasters through the experienced utility approach. These works, however, were not based on an acute and unprecedented single event as in the case of our study.…”

Disasters, donations, and tax law changes: Disentangling effects on subjective well-being by exploiting a natural experiment

“…Most studies report negative effects on the population in the respective country or area (Carroll, Frijters, & Shields, 2009;Kimball et al, 2006;Kountouris & Remoundou, 2011;Luechinger & Raschky, 2009). Recent studies have also found that distantly remote disasters can have negative effects on populations in other countries (Metcalfe et al, 2011), even when a similar disaster seems geographically impossible in that country (Goebel, Krekel, Tiefenbach, & Ziebarth, 2015).…”