2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing variable renewable energy for peak demand requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obviate this concern, resource planning models might use multiple years of resource data (Shaner et al 2018) or select a 'worse' year for evaluating renewable energy capacity value. While small errors in capacity values might have little impact on overall capacity planning results, large misestimates can lead to significant changes in capacity buildout and anticipated costs (Zhou et al 2018). More sophisticated probabilistic models (Dent et al 2016) can be used to validate planning model results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obviate this concern, resource planning models might use multiple years of resource data (Shaner et al 2018) or select a 'worse' year for evaluating renewable energy capacity value. While small errors in capacity values might have little impact on overall capacity planning results, large misestimates can lead to significant changes in capacity buildout and anticipated costs (Zhou et al 2018). More sophisticated probabilistic models (Dent et al 2016) can be used to validate planning model results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many renewable energy prediction studies began in 2000 (Tsai et al, 2017). Because of the uncertainty of renewable energy (Notton et al, 2018), the perspective of its prediction is diversified, which prompts each study to selectively consider different factors in its prediction, such as traditional energy (Nadimi and Tokimatsu, 2017), nuclear energy (Kok and Benli, 2017), policy (Black et al, 2014), installed capacity (Zhou et al, 2018), technology (Ruedabayona et al, 2019), and economy (Ozcan and Ozturk, 2019). Therefore, it is very difficult to accurately summarize and classify existing studies, but summarizing and reviewing existing studies is helpful to highlight the characteristics of this study.…”
Section: Selection Of Relevant Indicators For Renewable Energy Predicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 134 balancing areas also face system reliability constraints, such as operating reserve and planning reserve requirements to ensure grid reliability and adequate capacity exists to meet peak demand, respectively. Technology-specific curtailment rates are computed in a submodule that accounts for the availability of a resource, and technology-specific capacity credit (the potential contribution to the planning reserve margin) is computed in a submodule that computes a technology's availability in peak net load hours (Zhou, Cole, and Frew 2018). Figure 16 shows the U.S. regions as represented in ReEDS.…”
Section: Hydrogenmentioning
confidence: 99%