Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus isolated redo surgical aortic valve replacement

Yousef, Sarah; Serna‐Gallegos, Derek; Iyanna, Nidhi; Kliner, Dustin; Brown, James A; Toma, Catalin; Makani, Amber; West, D. R. F.; Wang, Yisi; Thoma, Floyd; Ahmad, Danial; Yoon, Pyongsoo; Chu, Danny; Kaczorowski, David J.; Bonatti, Johannes; Sultan, Ibrahim

doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2023.06.014

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Permanent Pacemaker Rates Following Valve-in-valve Transcath...1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article6

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The retrospective institutional database analysis by Yousef et al 1 compared 198 patients who underwent valve-in-valve (ViV) TAVR with 147 patients who underwent redo SAVR. Five patients in the ViV TAVR group required a PPM (2.5%), whereas 15 patients in the redo SAVR group required a PPM (10.2%; P = .002).…”

Section: Permanent Pacemaker Rates Following Valve-in-valve Transcath...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 2023, we have had several noteworthy publications concerning surgery and rhythm management. Two studies—a retrospective institutional database analysis 1 and a literature review with meta-analysis 2 —examined the outcomes for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) compared to redo surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for failed surgical aortic bioprostheses. The authors included a comparison of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation rates between the two groups.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation