2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04346-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valved stentless composite graft: clinical outcomes and hemodynamic characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stentless xenografts have been widely used owing to improved flow pattern, durability, and excellent longterm clinical results; possible disadvantages include difficult handling, limited durability compared with mechanical valve conduits [53], and severe conduit calcification with time [22].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stentless xenografts have been widely used owing to improved flow pattern, durability, and excellent longterm clinical results; possible disadvantages include difficult handling, limited durability compared with mechanical valve conduits [53], and severe conduit calcification with time [22].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, several ways of replacing the root with bioprosthesis-containing conduits have been described [5,6], though none of them can assure freedom from prosthetic degeneration in young patients. The issue is a minor concern in the elderly when homograft or xenograft roots may be an option although not all surgeons keep them in stock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach has been championed by Urbansky et al who have been using a composite graft consisting of a stentless valve bioprosthesis incorporated within a sealed woven Dacron tube graft [23][24][25]. The composite graft is assembled intra-operatively after measuring the size of the aortic valve annulus.…”
Section: The Subcoronary Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Urbansky et al have recently reported their experience in 45 consecutive patients operated on between 1998 and 2001 with their homemade composite graft (Table 1) [25]. At a mean follow-up of 18 months, no patient required a valverelated reoperation and three thromboembolic events (two minor, one major) were recorded.…”
Section: The Subcoronary Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%