“…Amongst various energy storage technologies redox flow batteries (RFBs) are an economical solution at scale due to their characteristic decoupling of energy and power that ensures sublinear scaling of cost (Chen et al, 2009;Zhao et al, 2015). A plethora of possible RFBs have been investigated and proposed in the literature, such as, Fe-X (X = Cr, Mn, Fe, Zn) (Fedkiw and Watts, 1984;Skyllas-Kazacos et al, 2011;Gong et al, 2016;Selverston et al, 2017;Archana et al, 2020;Zhen et al, 2020), V-X (X = Mn, Ce, Br, V) (Chen et al, 2009;Prifti et al, 2012;Cunha et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2015;Sankarasubramanian et al, 2019;Reynard et al, 2020;Raja et al, 2021;Wang et al, 2021) and Zn-X (X = Ce, Br, Mn, V) (Chen et al, 2009;Leung et al, 2011;Dewage et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2015;Jiang et al, 2018;Ulaganathan et al, 2019;Naresh et al, 2021) RFBs. Critically, the translation of these RFBs to the market hinges on numerous factors, namely -1) cell potential, 2) energy density (a function of salt solubility in the electrolyte), 3) chemical and electrochemical stability of the cell components, and finally (and possibly most importantly) 4) availability of the redox active species at low marginal cost and at scale.…”