VANET routing protocols: Issues and challenges

Singh, Surmukh; Agrawal, Sunil

doi:10.1109/raecs.2014.6799625

Cited by 106 publications

(58 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Few challenges that come in the way of researchers are like the use of fast cryptographic algorithms, authentication of nodes from external and internal attacks, key distribution for encryption and decryption of a message and high mobility of nodes. [15] In this research work a technique is proposed and is called as improved Vehicular Security through Reputation and Plausibility Checks (I-VSRP). This technique uses the Route table concept which is more effective than position based routing and VSRP.…”

Section: Proposed Technique: Improved Vsrpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improved VSRP using Route Table in VANET

Kumar¹,

Mutneja²,

Gill³

2017

International Journal of Innovative Research in Electrical, Ele

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Technology in day to day life is developing with very high speed and many new branches have been originated from the wireless sensor networks. The VANET is also a branch of the Wireless Sensor Networks. In VANET the information is shared between nodes through wireless communication network. As security is an essential issue in WSN, any successful attack can cause a great harm or threat for drivers as well as passengers. It can decrease the speed of the whole network and may put a great impact on the performance of the network. Routing between the moving vehicles is very challenging and quite interesting task. In this research work , the performance evaluation of the GPSR (Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing) which is very popular Position Based Routing (PBR) in VANET is done by comparing it with other routing techniques i.e. VSRP (Vehicular Security through Reputation and Plausibility Checks) technique and the proposed improved Reputation and Plausibility Checks technique using Route table. In proposed technique, the dataflow route table is used to improve the results of its counterpart technique (VSRP) using the speed, direction and the orientation of the neighbouring vehicles. The comparison between the results of all the three techniques is done and it is concluded that the results of proposed technique are better than VSRP with the same conditions and parameters.

show abstract

Section: Proposed Technique: Improved Vsrpmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improved VSRP using Route Table in VANET

Kumar¹,

Mutneja²,

Gill³

2017

International Journal of Innovative Research in Electrical, Ele

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…S. J. Soni and J. S. Shah [4] compared and evaluated performance of four MANET routing protocols under various CBR and TCP traffic patterns in NS2 and notice that for CBR traffic, AODV (reactive) protocol performs better than rest of routing protocols while for TCP traffic, OLSR (proactive) protocol performs better that rest of routing protocols. Surmukh Singh and Sunil Agrawal [5] studied the merits and demerits of the protocols in VANET for different supported numerous traffic situations. They also have analyzed that more analysis is needed to verify the numerous characteristics of a routing protocols.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Figure 1 show that the node N selects the MPR node from its 1-hop neighbor node and only node which are selected as an MPR node are only sent messages to its 2-hop neighbor nodes. The 1-hop neighbor, which are not selected as MPR set are read and process the packet, but it cannot retransmit the broadcast packets received from any node N [5] .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Improved Olsr Protocol for Vanet

2017

IJAERD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…AODV, OLSR, and GPSR are popular routing protocols within mobile ad hoc networks, and represent three different methods to V2V communication. Recent research has been dedicated to testing and adjusting these protocols for vehicular networks [82][83][84][85]; therefore, testing these protocols will ensure our predictive handover will be compatible within vehicular networks. AODV, OLSR, and GPSR were modified in this thesis for compatibility with mobile IP, based on the method detailed in [86].…”

Section: Networkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Predictive mobile IP handover for vehicular networks

Magnano

Xin

Boukerche

2015

2015 IEEE 40th Conference on Local Computer Networks (LCN)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vehicular networks are an emerging technology that offer potential for providing a variety of new services. However, extending vehicular networks to include IP connections is still problematic, due in part to the incompatibility of mobile IP handovers with the increased mobility of vehicles. The handover process, consisting of discovery, registration, and packet forwarding, has a large overhead and disrupts connectivity. With increased handover frequency and smaller access point dwell times in vehicular networks, the handover causes a large degradation in performance. This thesis proposes a predictive handover solution, us-

show abstract

VANET routing protocols: Issues and challenges

Cited by 106 publications

References 9 publications

Improved VSRP using Route Table in VANET

Improved VSRP using Route Table in VANET

Improved Olsr Protocol for Vanet

Predictive mobile IP handover for vehicular networks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About