2022
DOI: 10.1177/15593258221078387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vanishing by Design of Cancer Risk Uncertainty for Low Radiation Doses Is Misleading and Unscientific

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In establishing an approach to use in addressing health risks for low radiation doses to humans, researchers need to take into consideration that unlike animal-studies data, epidemiologic-studies data for humans are very noisy (wider stochastic error distributions) 5 so that any risk estimates generated using such data likely involve large errors. 5 , 6 Animal-studies data with smaller errors (for radiation doses and biological effects) than epidemiologic-studies data could be used in improving modeling methods employed in epidemiologic studies and in testing reliability of cancer risk predictions for low radiation doses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In establishing an approach to use in addressing health risks for low radiation doses to humans, researchers need to take into consideration that unlike animal-studies data, epidemiologic-studies data for humans are very noisy (wider stochastic error distributions) 5 so that any risk estimates generated using such data likely involve large errors. 5 , 6 Animal-studies data with smaller errors (for radiation doses and biological effects) than epidemiologic-studies data could be used in improving modeling methods employed in epidemiologic studies and in testing reliability of cancer risk predictions for low radiation doses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%