2006
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112006000577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vanishing enstrophy dissipation in two-dimensional Navier–Stokes turbulence in the inviscid limit

Abstract: Batchelor (Phys. Fluids, vol. 12, 1969, p. 233) developed a theory of two-dimensional turbulence based on the assumption that the dissipation of enstrophy (mean-square vorticity) tends to a finite non-zero constant in the limit of infinite Reynolds number Re. Here, by assuming power-law spectra, including the one predicted by Batchelor's theory, we prove that the maximum dissipation of enstrophy is in fact zero in this limit. Specifically, as Re → ∞, the dissipation approaches zero no slower than (ln Re) −1/2.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
48
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the analytical estimate (2.5) for Batchelor's spectrum (3.1), for which the ratio | ω| 2 1/2 / |∇ω| 2 diverges as Re → ∞. On the other hand, the ratio | ω| 2 / |∇ω| 2 should be proportional to k 2 ν ∝ ν −1 , for enstrophy spectra shallower than k −3 (see Tran & Dritschel 2006). That is, this ratio defines the upper limit of the 'inertial range', and it is expected to increase with Re.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is consistent with the analytical estimate (2.5) for Batchelor's spectrum (3.1), for which the ratio | ω| 2 1/2 / |∇ω| 2 diverges as Re → ∞. On the other hand, the ratio | ω| 2 / |∇ω| 2 should be proportional to k 2 ν ∝ ν −1 , for enstrophy spectra shallower than k −3 (see Tran & Dritschel 2006). That is, this ratio defines the upper limit of the 'inertial range', and it is expected to increase with Re.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Such properties constitute the key hypothesis of Kolmogorov's theory of three-dimensional turbulence. On the other hand, for two-dimensional turbulence in the same limit, the maximum enstrophy dissipation rate (the parallel of T ) vanishes and T diverges (Tran & Dritschel 2006;Dritschel, Tran & Scott 2007). For the present case, Ohkitani & Yamada (1997) suggested similar behaviours for T and T, thus favouring the possibility of no finite-time singularities in the inviscid dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…It may be in order to recall that in the case of 2D Navier-Stokes equations, the dissipation rate η of enstrophy is estimated from above [18] as η ∝ (log Re) −1/2 , where Re is the Reynolds number. In the large-Re limit, η decays to zero, but does so very slowly (as a transcendental function).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%