2000
DOI: 10.1097/00006250-200011001-00008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vanishing Gastroschisis and Short-Bowel Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
17
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
17
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter complication affects approximately 15% of infants born with gastroschisis [3,4]. In the severest cases, necrosis and loss of large portions of small or large bowel occur resulting in the so-called vanishing bowel syndrome [5,6]. Bowel atresia and vanishing bowel are thought to arise from prenatal constriction at the lesion site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter complication affects approximately 15% of infants born with gastroschisis [3,4]. In the severest cases, necrosis and loss of large portions of small or large bowel occur resulting in the so-called vanishing bowel syndrome [5,6]. Bowel atresia and vanishing bowel are thought to arise from prenatal constriction at the lesion site.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case 1 was described by Barsoom et al 8 Gastroschisis was diagnosed in the second trimester after a high maternal AFP. However, at birth, no abdominal wall defect was seen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C'est, en effet, Johnson et al qui publient le premier cas de disparition complète d'un laparoschisis, associée à une atré-sie intestinale, en 1971 [4]. Depuis lors, seulement 11 cas de fermeture pariétale complète ont été décrits ; dans six cas, la fermeture s'accompagnait d'une réintégration apparente des anses digestives [4][5][6][7][8][9] alors que, pour les cinq autres, persistait à la naissance une masse tissulaire, partiellement nécrotique, appendue au cordon ombilical [10][11][12][13][14]. Pour les six premiers nouveau-nés, l'observation, à la naissance, n'objectivait aucune cicatrice cutanée ; l'insertion cordonale ainsi que la paroi abdominale étaient normales et aucun signe pouvant faire évoquer l'existence, in utero, d'un laparoschisis n'était noté (Tableau 1).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified