2008
DOI: 10.4321/s0365-66912008000100006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variabilidad inerobservador en el diagnóstico y clasificación de la retinopatía diabética mediante biomicroscopía

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, grading of DR made in the clinic by the examining physician are not always accurate. Inter-observer variability for grading DR varies from 0.62-0.87 in different studies [20,21]. This system provides a highly accurate and consistent diagnosis and grading of DR, a significant improvement over the human error and variability inherent in human diagnosis.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Second, grading of DR made in the clinic by the examining physician are not always accurate. Inter-observer variability for grading DR varies from 0.62-0.87 in different studies [20,21]. This system provides a highly accurate and consistent diagnosis and grading of DR, a significant improvement over the human error and variability inherent in human diagnosis.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 98%