2020
DOI: 10.18671/scifor.v48n125.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variabilidade genética em progênies de Campomanesia xanthocarpa Mart. ex O. Berg em viveiro

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater the environmental influence in the tests (CV e ), the lower the genetic values observed (h 2 a , h 2 w , h 2 m and b ̂) (Table 1), which is consistent with results obtained in studies on other forest species (Menegatti et al 2016, Kampa et al 2020, Corrêa et al 2021, Garuzzo et al 2021. As noted, these estimates may vary according to populations, environments, traits, nature of the traits, age, and estimation methods used (Pires et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The greater the environmental influence in the tests (CV e ), the lower the genetic values observed (h 2 a , h 2 w , h 2 m and b ̂) (Table 1), which is consistent with results obtained in studies on other forest species (Menegatti et al 2016, Kampa et al 2020, Corrêa et al 2021, Garuzzo et al 2021. As noted, these estimates may vary according to populations, environments, traits, nature of the traits, age, and estimation methods used (Pires et al 2011).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The characterization of the genetic variability of base populations of forest species in the form of progeny tests has been well documented in research carried out under field conditions (Garuzzo et al 2021, Lustri et al 2021, Souza et al 2021. As a way of anticipating this characterization, morphophysiological assessments at the seedling (Kampa et al 2020) and plantlet stages (Menegatti et al 2016, Corrêa et al 2021) have also been conducted. However, the question remains as to whether progenies that stand out phenotypically and genotypically at the plantlet stage also show good phenotypic and genotypic performance at more advanced stages of development, such as the seedling and juvenile stages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimates of genetic parameters for the studied traits are shown in Table 1. Days to flowering (DFL), days to fruiting (DFR), green pod weight (GPW), green pod width (GW), green pod length (GPL), green pod thickness (GPT), number of grains per pod (NGP), and green grain thickness (GGT) showed heritability higher than 70%, indicating little effect of the environment and control by genetic variability components, denoting potential for selection (KAMPA et al, 2020). Heritability (h²) expresses the proportion of genetic variance over phenotypic variance (SANTOS et al, 2018).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Populations that exhibit high CV g indicate potential for improvement via genetic gains in the breeding program (Zanata et al, 2010). The main advantage of utilizing the coefficient of variation in trait analysis is to enable the quantification and weighting of the proportion of variation within a population, which exists due to genetic and environmental factors (Kampa et al, 2020). This parameter, along with the h², provides the basis for decision-making to increase forage production within the current P. notatum Flügge breeding program.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%