1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0764-4469(99)80070-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variabilité spécifique à l'intérieur des groupes fonctionnels. Étude du remaniement sédimentaire de deux bivalves Veneridae, Ruditapes decussatus et Venerupis aurea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Species of which only one individual was identified in the set of experimental cores (i.e. Marphysa sanguinea and Venerupis aurea), were removed from the independent variables, even though the latter is known to cause significant biodiffusive mixing when measured in monospecific microcosms (Franç ois et al, 1999).…”
Section: Relationship Between Benthic Populations and Bioturbationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species of which only one individual was identified in the set of experimental cores (i.e. Marphysa sanguinea and Venerupis aurea), were removed from the independent variables, even though the latter is known to cause significant biodiffusive mixing when measured in monospecific microcosms (Franç ois et al, 1999).…”
Section: Relationship Between Benthic Populations and Bioturbationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge about physical factors complicating this scenario is steadily increasing (e.g., Billi et al, 1992;Wilcock, 1998;Pyrce and Ashmore, 2003;MacKinnon et al, 2004;Pearce and Walker, 2005), and mobile animals complicate this scenario even more: they have diverse mechanistic abilities to modify solid surfaces and to increase or decrease the transport of solids, and these animal actions vary in space and time (e.g., Butler, 1995;Statzner et al, 2003b;Butler, 2006). Thus, for a start, quantifications of such action of animals focused on separate singlespecies assessments of mammals (e.g., Butler, 1995;Trimble and Mendel, 1995;Butler, 2006), salmonids and other fish groups (e.g., Flecker, 1996;Montgomery et al, 1996;DeVries, 1997;Rennie and Millar, 2000;Gottesfeld et al, 2004), and many groups of marine invertebrates (e.g., Fager, 1964;Eckman et al, 1981;Meadows et al, 1990;Willows et al, 1998;François et al, 1999;Botto and Iribarne, 2000;Katrak and Bird, 2003;Jackson et al, 2005; see also the review by Murray et al, 2002) or freshwater invertebrates (e.g., McCall and Tevesz, 1982;Statzner et al, 1996;Parkyn et al, 1997;Statzner et al, 1999;2000;MermillodBlondin et al, 2002;Creed and Reed, 2004;Usio and Townsend, 2004;Takao et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present paper, we define a new functional group, the 'gallerydiffusor' group, as distinct from strict biodiffusors, e.g. the amphipod Pontoporeia hoyi (Robbins et al 1979) and the bivalves Ruditapes decussatus and Venerupis aurea (François et al 1999). This group comprises organisms with particulate tracer distribution patterns similar to the diffusion profile, but whose sediment reworking is neither random nor local.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%