2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.11.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability Among Breast Radiation Oncologists in Delineation of the Postsurgical Lumpectomy Cavity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
132
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
6
132
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…That said, CLI were low even for TB 6M in comparison to those previously reported (6,8,23). Table 4 demonstrates that there were significant differences in median TB volumes between observers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…That said, CLI were low even for TB 6M in comparison to those previously reported (6,8,23). Table 4 demonstrates that there were significant differences in median TB volumes between observers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…All imaging datasets were graded for seroma visibility by observer AK using a cavity visualisation score (CVS) which ranges from 1 (cavity invisible) to 5 (cavity borders clearly identifiable) (6). Four anonymised copies were made of each dataset.…”
Section: Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consistency in delineation is crucial in further development of NTCP models for coronary arteries and in the clinical practice to optimize the RT plan for each patient. Several studies have documented significant inter-observer variation in delineation of target volumes and OARs [16][17][18]. One previously published study on reproducibility of delineating coronary arteries showed a substantial inter-observer variation in estimated dose [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has shown to inaccurately define the tumor bed and dosimetry is poor (Benda et al, 2003;Landis et al, 2007;Ringash et al 2004) .An ideal method for the delineation of the surgical cavity for the boost volume has not been established (Landis et al, 2007;Ringash et al, 2004). Ultrasound, MRI and CT scans with or without surgical clips are the currently available techniques for identifying the boost volume.…”
Section: Ultrasound Imaging For Tumor Bed Delineationmentioning
confidence: 99%