2016
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stw700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability among stars in the M 67 field fromKepler/K2-Campaign-5light curves

Abstract: We examine the photometric variability of stars in the M 67 field using Kepler/K2-Campaign-5 light curves. Variabilities and periods were determined for 639 stars. The mean photometric period of 28 single Sun-like members stars in M 67 is 23.4 ± 1.2 d. This corresponds to a gyro-age of 3.7 ± 0.3 Gyr, assuming the periods can be associated with rotation. The intrinsic variabilities of the solar analogs are greater than the Sun's variability, as measure from VIRGO fluxes. We also find evidence that the single cl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…who concluded no or little mass loss (equivalent to Reimers η below 0.2) for the open clusters NGC 6819 and NGC 6791, which bracket the age of M67.Finally, we obtain an average age of Age grid = 3.46 ± 0.13 Gyr for our giants. This is on the lower side compared to traditional isochrone fitting results ranging 3.6-4.6 Gyr Gyr(Gonzalez 2016) and 4.2±0.2 Gyr(Barnes et al 2016), but individual star ages are statistically compatible with those from other methods(Table 1,…”
mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…who concluded no or little mass loss (equivalent to Reimers η below 0.2) for the open clusters NGC 6819 and NGC 6791, which bracket the age of M67.Finally, we obtain an average age of Age grid = 3.46 ± 0.13 Gyr for our giants. This is on the lower side compared to traditional isochrone fitting results ranging 3.6-4.6 Gyr Gyr(Gonzalez 2016) and 4.2±0.2 Gyr(Barnes et al 2016), but individual star ages are statistically compatible with those from other methods(Table 1,…”
mentioning
confidence: 44%
“…M 67. The sample was drawn from Gonzalez (2016), who, similar to Douglas et al (2014) and Rebull et al (2016), studied stellar variability in K2 LCs. They started with the sample used in the photometric survey by Nardiello et al (2016), which they supplemented with other recent membership studies by (Yadav et al 2008;proper motions) and (Geller et al 2015;radial velocities).…”
Section: Open Clusters In K2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample was drawn from Gonzalez (2016), who, similar to Douglas et al (2014) and Rebull et al (2016), studied stellar variability in K2 LCs. They started with the sample used in the photometric survey by Nardiello et al (2016), which they supplemented with other recent membership studies by Yadav et al (2008) (proper motions) and Geller et al (2015) (radial velocities).…”
Section: M67mentioning
confidence: 99%