Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 2001 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity (C
DOI: 10.1109/rams.2001.902484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability analysis and robust design of electronic system using cellular evolutionary strategies and interval arithmetic techniques

Abstract: Many real systems are difficult to model and control due to incomplete knowledge of the system behavior and the availability of only short-term or unreliable data records. Hence, the uncertainty, which results from both the measurement and modeling process, should be taken into account when making predictions or designing systems.Although this type of analysis, from input to output, can provide useful information to the decision-maker, we present an approach in which the inverse problem (robust design) can als… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Piazzi and Visioli (1998b) propose a new feedforward/feedback synthesis design with the aim of minimizing the worst-case settling-time relative to the transition. Rocco et al (2001) propose an approach based on the combination of two tools: Interval Analysis and CES (Cellular Evolutionary Strategies). The result is the achieving of only one interval evaluation and of the exact range of the constraint functions inside the generated box.…”
Section: Robustness Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Piazzi and Visioli (1998b) propose a new feedforward/feedback synthesis design with the aim of minimizing the worst-case settling-time relative to the transition. Rocco et al (2001) propose an approach based on the combination of two tools: Interval Analysis and CES (Cellular Evolutionary Strategies). The result is the achieving of only one interval evaluation and of the exact range of the constraint functions inside the generated box.…”
Section: Robustness Designmentioning
confidence: 99%