2008
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/6/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability analysis of SAR from 20 MHz to 2.4 GHz for different adult and child models using finite-difference time-domain

Abstract: This paper deals with the variability of body models used in numerical dosimetry studies. Six adult anthropomorphic voxel models have been collected and used to build 5-, 8- and 12-year-old children using a morphing method respecting anatomical parameters. Finite-difference time-domain calculations of a specific absorption rate (SAR) have been performed for a range of frequencies from 20 MHz to 2.4 GHz for isolated models illuminated by plane waves. A whole-body-averaged SAR is presented as well as the average… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
91
2
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
91
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Since local SAR 10g is more dependent on local geometry than the global average, these values are subject to greater uncertainty, especially when attempting to represent a population using a small number of models. It is difficult to assess this uncertainty; a 30% estimate is given in the mobile communications literature 28 (in the GHz range); however, the lower frequencies used in MRI will lead to deviations closer to 10% 29. Our own SAR 10g estimate for an adult model at 3 T was very close to the scanner's prediction (10.1 W kg −1 compared with 10 W kg −1 ), though this may be coincidental given that the model used by the scanner's own software is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since local SAR 10g is more dependent on local geometry than the global average, these values are subject to greater uncertainty, especially when attempting to represent a population using a small number of models. It is difficult to assess this uncertainty; a 30% estimate is given in the mobile communications literature 28 (in the GHz range); however, the lower frequencies used in MRI will lead to deviations closer to 10% 29. Our own SAR 10g estimate for an adult model at 3 T was very close to the scanner's prediction (10.1 W kg −1 compared with 10 W kg −1 ), though this may be coincidental given that the model used by the scanner's own software is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such biological effects may be more significant for children, because it has been argued that different head shapes and thinner skulls may make them more susceptible to RF energy [Kheifets et al, 2005;Wiart et al, 2005;Conil et al, 2008]. RF exposure from a mobile phone handset has been associated with slightly shorter reaction times in children [Preece et al, 2005].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 Thinner skin and skull, and large head compared to body in children when matched with adults led to higher SAR values after exposure to EMF. Conil et al 25 reported mean resonance frequency as 60 MHz in adults, while 80, 100 and 120 MHz, respectively, in 12, 8 and 5 years old models. Children may be more sensitive to EMF exposure than adults; however, all the side effects of EMF and protection principles have not been fully clarified today.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%