2019
DOI: 10.3390/e21070661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability and Reproducibility of Directed and Undirected Functional MRI Connectomes in the Human Brain

Abstract: A growing number of studies are focusing on methods to estimate and analyze the functional connectome of the human brain. Graph theoretical measures are commonly employed to interpret and synthesize complex network-related information. While resting state functional MRI (rsfMRI) is often employed in this context, it is known to exhibit poor reproducibility, a key factor which is commonly neglected in typical cohort studies using connectomics-related measures as biomarkers. We aimed to fill this gap by analyzin… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Local metrics: local strength, betweenness centrality, measures of centrality, local efficiency, clustering coefficient, measures of functional segregation. Global measures: global strength, global clustering coefficient, global efficiency and transitivity ( Conti et al, 2019 ). All metrics were computed using the Brain Connectivity Toolbox ( Rubinov and Sporns, 2010 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local metrics: local strength, betweenness centrality, measures of centrality, local efficiency, clustering coefficient, measures of functional segregation. Global measures: global strength, global clustering coefficient, global efficiency and transitivity ( Conti et al, 2019 ). All metrics were computed using the Brain Connectivity Toolbox ( Rubinov and Sporns, 2010 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, further investigation is needed before a composite connectivity metric can be proposed as the standard for neurodegenerative studies. This include assessing the robustness of the connectivity metrics to the intra-subject and inter-subject variability in longitudinal studies ( Conti et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: A Multi-feature Computational Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ND are in general bounded within the interval [−1, 1] (figure 11a), however for the top 10% strongest estimated connections, the absolute value of the ND is lower than 0.3 (figure 11b). Considering the low reproducibility of resting state fMRI as quantified using the same data employed in this paper [52], this result points towards a satisfactory degree of robustness in our method. (see [52] for reproducibility for general GC in resting state fMRI).…”
Section: (B) In Vivo Human Connectome Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Considering the low reproducibility of resting state fMRI as quantified using the same data employed in this paper [52], this result points towards a satisfactory degree of robustness in our method. (see [52] for reproducibility for general GC in resting state fMRI).…”
Section: (B) In Vivo Human Connectome Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%