1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1990.tb16975.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability and Stereotypy of Spontaneous Motility as a Predictor of Neurological Development of Preterm Infants

Abstract: SUMMARY Observations of the variability stereotypy ratio of spontaneous motility in a group of 47 preterm infants showed that stereotyped motor activity was related to the neurological diagnosis at term age. A minority of the neurologically deviant infants at term recovered during infancy. The presence or absence of intra‐uterine growth retardation and an accumulation of obnoxious antenatal, perinatal and postnatal events seemed to affect outcome, particularly in the presence of extensive and permanent ultraso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
7

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
10
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification of movement variation versus stereotypy is based on clinical observation, not on video assessment as in the assessment of general movements . This implies that only striking stereotypies, including consistent asymmetries, are recorded as atypical, in line with clinical practices . The inclusion of seven items on movement quality also means that asymmetries, such as a head‐turn preference with an accompanying asymmetry in arm movements, and eventually in hand movements which occurs relatively frequently in 2‐month or 3‐month‐old infants, only results in a reduction of 2 or 3 points.…”
Section: Sinda's Neurological Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The classification of movement variation versus stereotypy is based on clinical observation, not on video assessment as in the assessment of general movements . This implies that only striking stereotypies, including consistent asymmetries, are recorded as atypical, in line with clinical practices . The inclusion of seven items on movement quality also means that asymmetries, such as a head‐turn preference with an accompanying asymmetry in arm movements, and eventually in hand movements which occurs relatively frequently in 2‐month or 3‐month‐old infants, only results in a reduction of 2 or 3 points.…”
Section: Sinda's Neurological Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 This implies that only striking stereotypies, including consistent asymmetries, are recorded as atypical, in line with clinical practices. 7,[10][11][12] The inclusion of seven items on movement quality also means that asymmetries, such as a head-turn preference with an accompanying asymmetry in arm movements, and eventually in hand movements which occurs relatively frequently in 2-month or 3-month-old infants, only results in a reduction of 2 or 3 points. The latter may be interpreted as a minor dysfunction.…”
Section: Sinda's Neurological Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduced complexity (monotony), jerkiness, and ⁄ or a cramped character were considered to be signs of abnormality and were scored separately. [16][17][18] Differences in the degree of monotony, jerkiness, and cramped character were not scored.…”
Section: Recording and Evaluation Of Spontaneous Motor Repertoirementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median motor optimality score was 9 (range 7-15) in the group with a low level of self-mobility (GMFCS levels III-V) and 12 (range [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] in the group with a high level of self-mobility (GMFCS levels I and II). The optimal cut-off point of the motor optimality score for distinguishing between these two groups, determined by the receiver operating characteristics curve, was 9.…”
Section: Relationship Between Motor Repertoire and Neurological Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to reaching, a battery of neuromotor examinations (NME) were performed by a physiotherapist and a neonatologist at 2 and 10 months CA. The infants’ neurological status was examined by the neonatologist using a modified version of Touwen and Amiel-Tison’s methods (Touwen 1978; Amiel-Tison and Grenier 1986; Touwen 1990). The physiotherapist used the instrument “Structured observation of Motor Behavior” (SOMP) that estimates both the infant’s level of motor development and the quality of the achieved motor function level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%