2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability as predictor in L2 writing proficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we found some evidence in favor of gradual progression from coordination to subordination with development; in our intermediate subset, learners moved from reliance on coordination to using more subordinate structures over the course of the program. Although these findings align with the results and conclusions of some previous studies (Huang et al, 2021;Mazgutova & Kormos, 2015;Polat et al, 2020), we make this conclusion with caution, given that our sample in this analysis included only intermediate learners.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, we found some evidence in favor of gradual progression from coordination to subordination with development; in our intermediate subset, learners moved from reliance on coordination to using more subordinate structures over the course of the program. Although these findings align with the results and conclusions of some previous studies (Huang et al, 2021;Mazgutova & Kormos, 2015;Polat et al, 2020), we make this conclusion with caution, given that our sample in this analysis included only intermediate learners.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In line with previous research (Bulté & Housen, 2014;Crossley & McNamara, 2014;Huang et al, 2021;Yang et al, 2015), to investigate the relationships between the complexity indices and the program's curricular levels for RQ2 and the relationships between the complexity indices and WPT scores for RQ3, we conducted correlation and multiple linear regression analyses. An a priori power analysis for multiple regression was conducted to determine an adequate sample size for models with a desired power level of .8, a significance threshold of p = .05, an anticipated large effect size of .60, and nine predictors (these nine predictors for RQs 2 and 3 were identified in RQ1).…”
Section: Analysis Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that a learner's performance fluctuates when measured with both specific and holistic measures (Spoelman & Verspoor, 2010;Tilma, 2014;Verspoor et al, 2008;Verspoor et al, 2017). Research has also demonstrated that learners whose language exhibits substantial variability may be more successful than their less-variable peers (Chan et al, 2015;Huang et al, 2021;Lowie & Verspoor, 2019).…”
Section: Tracing L2 Learners' Language Constructions: a Dub Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, CAF studies based on CDST have always focused on an individual's language development rather than affording the same amount of attention to macro-level group averages as traditional approaches do. Some studies treat CAF as a holistic system (e.g., Larsen-Freeman, 2006;Norris and Ortega, 2009;Verspoor et al, 2012;Polat and Kim, 2014;Li and Sui, 2017;Bai and Ye, 2018;Lowie and Verspoor, 2019;Huang et al, 2021;Verspoor and de Bot, 2021). For example, Larsen-Freeman (2006) investigated the development of grammatical complexity, lexical complexity, accuracy, and fluency of five Chinese EFL learners over 4 months, from the perspective of CDST.…”
Section: Empirical Research On Complexity Accuracy and Fluency Based ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five kinds of CAF trajectories were identified, including "peaks/valleys, " "ascending in curve, " "descending in curve, " "quasi-horizontal line, " and "mixed mode" (Li and Sui, 2017, p. 392). Meanwhile, other studies have examined how variability drives L2 development (e.g., de Bot et al, 2007;Lowie and Verspoor, 2019;Huang et al, 2021;Verspoor and de Bot, 2021). For example, in research by Lowie and Verspoor (2019), the degree of variability was conceptualized by a coefficient of variation and calculated as standard deviation divided by the mean of the holistic rating score of language proficiency (i.e., complexity, accuracy, and fluency).…”
Section: Empirical Research On Complexity Accuracy and Fluency Based ...mentioning
confidence: 99%