2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10958-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in comorbidites and health services use across homeless typologies: multicenter data linkage between healthcare and homeless systems

Abstract: Background Homelessness is associated with substantial morbidity. Data linkages between homeless and health systems are important to understand unique needs across homeless populations, identify homeless individuals not registered in homeless databases, quantify the impact of housing services on health-system use, and motivate health systems and payers to contribute to housing solutions. Methods We performed a cross-sectional survey including six h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior nationwide studies have had benefits ours lacked: being conducted, for example, within a national health service (Scotland) in which all patients have a unique identifier across datasets 24 or in a country (Switzerland) where patients agreed to use their social security numbers in record linkages 25 . Other studies have used PPRL to link datasets in specific parts of the US: within one county's services, for instance, 26 or in a state‐based clinical research network, 27 or focused on a single disease in one state 28 or on deduplication across multiple sites in a large metropolitan area 29 or between national government indices and national surveys 30 . Because our project, with its broad and diverse national scope, has established and validated ways to link EHR data from many healthcare institutions across the United States and to link widely varying datasets (from EHR data to images to population‐based data), these PPRL methods hold great potential for use beyond the N3C initiative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior nationwide studies have had benefits ours lacked: being conducted, for example, within a national health service (Scotland) in which all patients have a unique identifier across datasets 24 or in a country (Switzerland) where patients agreed to use their social security numbers in record linkages 25 . Other studies have used PPRL to link datasets in specific parts of the US: within one county's services, for instance, 26 or in a state‐based clinical research network, 27 or focused on a single disease in one state 28 or on deduplication across multiple sites in a large metropolitan area 29 or between national government indices and national surveys 30 . Because our project, with its broad and diverse national scope, has established and validated ways to link EHR data from many healthcare institutions across the United States and to link widely varying datasets (from EHR data to images to population‐based data), these PPRL methods hold great potential for use beyond the N3C initiative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 56 One aspect of digital technology which is showing promise to assist with surveillance in homeless populations is data linkage. 57 However, this has not yet been used for communicable disease surveillance. There are further challenges for data collection as participation in digital reporting would require a phone or computer and homeless individuals have reduced access to digital technology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moving forward, the usage of unique identifiers and linkage of health and social care data should be prioritized, as should the routine recording of housing status in primary care, hospital datasets, and national disease registries. Examples of successful linkages of homelessness and health datasets exist from Scotland and the US (Waugh et al 2018 ; Trick et al 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%