Variability in Primary Care Physician Attitudes Toward Medicaid Work Requirement Exemption Requests Made by Patients With Depression

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Medicaid work requirements seek to promote health and personal responsibility but can also jeopardize health care access. Physicians have a central function in assisting patients with exemption requests, but it is unclear how their role affects patient welfare, professionalism, and the ethical and legal justification of programs.OBJECTIVE To understand the degree of variability in physician response to assist patients with depression in receiving a Medicaid work requirement exemption. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSWe conducted a mailed survey experiment among practicing primary care physicians in the first 4 approved states (Arkansas, Kentucky, Indiana, New Hampshire) in July and October of 2019. We report response, cooperation, refusal, and contact rates in line with American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR) standards. EXPOSURESIn each state, we used an experimental factorial design to randomize recipients to 1 of 4 patient clinical scenarios. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome was the indicator of willingness to assist a patient reporting depression with an exemption. RESULTSWe received 715 responses (overall AAPOR response rate: 21%; cooperation rate: 84%; refusal rate: 4%; contact rate: 25%). Respondents' mean (SD) age was 54 (12) years; mean (SD) time since graduation, 26 (12) years; 435 (61%) identified as male; 177 as Democrat (25%); 156 as Republican (22%); 197 as Independent/other (28%); and 185 as declined/unknown (26%); the mean (SD) share of Medicaid patients was 29% (21%). We found that 97 of 387 physicians (25%) would offer assistance even when state policy would not support an exemption, and 170 of 315 (54%) would not offer assistance when regulations would require this. Moreover, 49 of 245 respondents (20%) who deemed an exemption appropriate indicated that they would not assist. State, administrative effort, political affiliation, and perceived appropriateness were statistically associated with the odds of assisting with an exemption. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this survey study of primary care physicians, we found substantial variation regarding willingness to assist patients qualifying for a work requirement exemption where none should exist. Insofar as work requirements are implemented again, it is critical to proactively identify measures to ensure that patients qualifying for exemptions are not put at risk due to either the burdensomeness of exemption procedures, or physicians' political or personal views.

Deep transfer learning from ordinary to capsule esophagogastroduodenoscopy for image quality controlling

“…We used the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and precision recall (PR) curve 25 to assess the performance of the DL models. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated, in internal cross validation dataset, point estimation was used to figure out the corresponding confidence interval 26 for internal cross validation. Whereas in prospective validation dataset, Wilson confidence intervals (95% CI) is used.…”