2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in the interpretation of grey-scale ultrasound features in assessing thyroid nodules: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Tumor morphology, microcalcifications, anteroposterior/ transverse diameter ratio, and echo intensity are important ultrasonographic features for the identification of PTMCs and MNGs (1-3). Among these features, echo intensity can be affected by the subjective assessment of an ultrasound physician (4,5). Quantification of echo intensity would improve the differential diagnosis of PTMCs and MNGs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tumor morphology, microcalcifications, anteroposterior/ transverse diameter ratio, and echo intensity are important ultrasonographic features for the identification of PTMCs and MNGs (1-3). Among these features, echo intensity can be affected by the subjective assessment of an ultrasound physician (4,5). Quantification of echo intensity would improve the differential diagnosis of PTMCs and MNGs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic performance can also show differences. Even if the same TIRADS is used, the subjective assessment can lead to diagnostic differences (4), particularly in the thyroid gland, which differs in thickness from the strap muscle, and the echo intensity can vary between different sections of the same strap muscle. Assessment of the signal intensity in nodules and strap muscles is greatly influenced by subjective factors (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another limitation of the study was the numerical difference of lesions with malignant potential qualified for the analysis, moreover, there were no sufficient data related to the comparative analysis using K-TIRADS and EU-TIRADS. Also noteworthy is the limitation due to the incompatibility of ultrasound results obtained by different investigators and by the same investigator (interobserver and intra-observer variability) (27) . Conclusions from the presented meta-analysis emphasize the clinical usefulness and confirm the validity of recommending the use of TIRADS classification in estimating the malignancy potential of focal thyroid lesions, with an emphasis on the highest accuracy of the method for ACR-TIRADS.…”
Section: Eu-tirads 82 90mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, there is great instability in using the echogenicity intensity of the neck strap muscle as a reference, which is susceptible to various factors, such as the evenness of the strap muscle thickness, and the percentages of muscle bers, tendons and adipose tissues. Thirdly, subjective differences in the judgment of echogenicity intensity between observers are inevitable [4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%