Variability in the surface temperature and melt extent of the Greenland ice sheet from MODIS

Abstract

[1] Satellite-derived moderate-resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) ice-surface temperature (IST) of the Greenland ice sheet shows a positive trend and two major melt events from 2000 to present. IST increased bỹ 0.55 AE 0.44 C/decade, with the greatest increase (~0.95 AE 0.44 C/decade) found in northwestern Greenland where coastal temperatures and mass loss are also increasing and outlet glaciers are accelerating. IST shows the highest rates of increase during summer (~1.35 AE 0.47 C/decade) and winter (~1.30 AE 1.53 C/decade), followed by spring (~0.60 AE 0.98 C/decade). In contrast, a decrease in IST was found in the autumn (~À1.49 AE 1.20 C/decade). The IST trends in this work are not statistically significant with the exception of the trend in northwestern Greenland. Major surface melt (covering 80% or more of the ice sheet) occurred during the 2002 and 2012 melt seasons where clear-sky measurements show a maximum melt of 87% and~95% of the ice sheet surface, respectively. In 2002, most of the extraordinary melt was ephemeral, whereas in 2012 the ice sheet not only experienced more total melt, but melt was more persistent, and the 2012 summer was the warmest in the MODIS record (À6.38 AE 3.98 C). Our data show that major melt events may not be particularly rare during the present period of ice sheet warming. Citation: Hall,

Comparative Study of Different Stochastic Weather Generators for Long-Term Climate Data Simulation

“…In particular, goodness of fit tests for such large datasets will likely produce significant results (p-value < 0.05) which could lead to false decisions. Moreover, in climate studies, statistical significance does not always provide an adequate basis for decision-making; for example, a rise in temperature by two degrees Celsius may not be statistically significant but it can adversely affect the vegetation growth and lead to ecological imbalances, possibly due to habitat alterations and/or melting glaciers [82][83][84]. In this study, emphasis was placed on visualization and an alternative to significance testing (Cohen's-d value), which provided a more reliable means of analyzing the resulting datasets [39,41,62].…”

Recent Advances in Our Understanding of the Role of Meltwater in the Greenland Ice Sheet System

“…The volume of meltwater generated at the GrIS surface has increased dramatically in recent years due to an expansion of ice sheet melt extent [12] and enhanced local melt rates [13] the result of: warmer air temperatures [14]; decreasing albedo [15] due to a darkening ice surface caused by increased aeolian dust [16], exposure of dirty Holocene ice [17], increased biota and cryoconite [18] and changing snowpack structure and moisture content [19]; decreased meltwater retention capacity in the firn [20]; and changing radiation budgets associated with synoptically driven changes in cloud cover [21,22]. The impact of this enhanced melt is reflected in the GrIS's increasingly negative balance, contributing 0.5 mm year to sea level between 1991 and 2015, at an accelerating rate of loss of~17 Gt year −2 [23•].…”

Dynamic perennial firn aquifer on an Arctic glacier

“…Precipitation is likely to increase with climatic warming, as is the area of Greenland with surface melt [Hall et al, 2013], so PFAs are likely to migrate or perhaps even expand in the future. Sufficient warming in Antarctica could lead to PFA formation in coastal areas, at lower elevations.…”