2015 IX Brazilian Symposium on Components, Architectures and Reuse Software 2015
DOI: 10.1109/sbcars.2015.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability Management in Dynamic Software Product Lines: A Systematic Mapping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When dealing with feature selection to meet desired quality objectives in DSPL, most of the existing studies are not focused on the interactions between contextual information and NFRs. In addition, such studies do not use any strategy to support the selection of the most suitable configuration [22]. As pointed out by Huebscher et.al.…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When dealing with feature selection to meet desired quality objectives in DSPL, most of the existing studies are not focused on the interactions between contextual information and NFRs. In addition, such studies do not use any strategy to support the selection of the most suitable configuration [22]. As pointed out by Huebscher et.al.…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we performed a pilot study in order to get feedback about the length and readability of the questionnaire and ConG4DaS description. After making some modifications to the questionnaire and to the description of ConG4DaS activities [Guedes 2020], we sent it to the researchers of LER (in Portuguese, Laboratório de Engenharia de Requisitos -Requirements Engineering Lab) and the DSPL researchers, who were the authors of the 54 selected studies from our systematic mapping about variability management in DSPL [Guedes et al 2015].…”
Section: Survey Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we performed a pilot study in order to get feedback about the length and readability of the questionnaire and ConG4DaS description. After making some modifications to the questionnaire and to the description of ConG4DaS activities [8], we sent it to the researchers of LER (in Portuguese, Laboratório de Engenharia de Requisitos -Requirements Engineering Lab) and the DSPL researchers, who were the authors of the 54 selected studies from our systematic mapping about variability management in DSPL [9].…”
Section: Survey Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%